Wednesday, November 18, 2009

Child of Peach (Taiwan, 1987)


Child of Peach is the first in the series of goofy Taiwanese martial arts fantasies starring the teenage actress Lam Siu-Lau in the role of Peach Kid, a figure somewhat surprisingly derived from Japanese folklore. I've already covered the third Peach Kid film, the wonderful Magic of Spell, on this blog, and while Child of Peach may not boast anything quite as awesome as Spell's miracle of human/root hybridization, Ginseng Boy, there is still plenty that marks it unmistakably as part of the series. And by that I refer to, among other things, its copious wire-work and cartoon-assisted displays of martial arts prowess, insistently chirpy Cantonese synth-pop score, abundance of bad guys with hair-metal dos and duds, and numerous instances of people, animals and giants pieces of fruit pissing and farting upon one another.

I don't want to go overboard in stating how "weird" Child of Peach is, first of all because so many of its absurdities are clearly played for laughs. Secondly, it's a children's adventure film made during the eighties, a time when a lot of children's adventure films were pretty damn weird regardless of their culture of origin. As such, I think it would sit fairly comfortably alongside movies like Labyrinth or The Neverending Story as part of a kiddie matinee of its era. Except, of course, for all of its violence. And its strangely translated swearing ("Your kung fu is nothing but a shit!"). Oh, and also? All of the face pissing.

Indeed the urine in Child of Peach flows like the great Yang Tze, into the faces and mouths of all and sundry and out of some places we would never have previously expected urine to issue from. This is a film in which the sight of a monkey pissing into an unwitting soldier's drinking cup represents the height of comedy. When an old lady's ass gets set ablaze, a giant, sentient peach uses its powerful stream to douse the flames, and then gives her a blast in the face as a coup de grace. And, in case you were trying to reassure yourself that that spray was just meant to be peach juice, the old lady then smells her fingers, makes a sour face and gives us angry verbal confirmation of the much less desirable alternative.

Child of Peach begins with a recounting of Peach Kid's origin, which is fairly archetypal and could even be characterized as a more peach-dependent telling of the Man of Steel's origin. It seems that at one time there existed, on the peak of Mount Holy Mother, high in the Himalayas, an enchanted paradise called the Peach Garden, which, despite its snowy surroundings, was always bathed in sunlight thank to the power of a magical weapon called the Sun Sword. The Peach Garden was lorded over by a budding nuclear family made up of the Master, his wife and their infant son, and guarded by a trio of kung fu capable, child-to-animal shape-shifters named Tiny Dog, Tiny Monkey and Tiny Cock -- the last of which names offers up opportunities for quips so lazy and juvenile that even I have to pass on them.

This being a fantasy martial arts film, and given that the requisite weapon of supernatural power has already been introduced, it is now time for a super-villain with designs on said weapon to make the scene, and so the Kabuki-esque King Devil and his Kajagoogoo-coiffed minions show up at the Peach Garden with the intention of stealing the Sun Sword. In the process, and despite the best efforts of the Tiny three, they murder the Master and Mistress and, with the removal of the sword, plunge the garden into endless, blizzard-swept night. Before this can happen, however, the Mistress places her young son inside of the Garden's -- Mascot? Diety? -- the Holy Peach, a giant, intelligent peach which opens up like a clamshell for the purpose. The peach then takes flight and heads for brighter territories, where it is soon found by an elderly couple who, taxing their creative capacities to their fullest, decide to name the enclosed child Peach Kid.

Because Peach Kid lived in the time before the time-lapse training montage was invented, we instead have a helpful fairy (Shadow Liu Chih-yu) on hand to transforms him from infant to strapping, super-strength endowed twelve year old in a matter of minutes. Thus he is now able to strike out on his mission of vengeance against King Devil, who has now enlisted the aid of an old witch and her army of Vince Neil-haired, zombie midget offspring in his quest for Martial World dominance. Coincidentally, it just so happens that an oafish young nobleman by the name of Knight Melon (Boon Saam) is assembling a force with the intention of mounting an invasion of the King's hideout, Devil Island, at that very moment. Unfortunately, Melon feels that having an underage superhero on his team might serve to upstage him during his glory moment, and so turns Peach Kid away. This proves to be a mistake, of course, leading -- once Peach Kid has re-teamed with the not-dead-after-all Tiny Monkey, Tiny Dog and Tiny Cock -- to Melon being permanently relegated to the role of comic relief fat guy once the high-flying preteen magical kung fu mayhem starts in earnest.

Having starred in such loopy fare as Kung Fu Wonder Child and Magic Warriors in addition to the Peach Kid films, Lam Siu-Lau is perhaps as much of a patron saint of the wild and silly side of Taiwanese martial arts cinema as Polly Shang-Kwan. In contrast to Shang-Kwan's game, in-on-the-joke approach to such shenanigans, however, Lam Siu-Lau affects an unflagging earnestness that serves to enhance the hilarity of the outlandishness around her equally well. This is especially appropriate since these films, unlike Shang-Kwan's, are less of a showcase for their stars' fighting abilities than they are for the myriad off-the-wall wonders that their simple but imaginative special effects accomplish.

Since Child of Peach exhibits a sort of constant, low-level oddness throughout the majority of its running time, it's difficult to single out any one feature as being the strangest. That is, of course, until we reach the film's final moments, during which the giant peach itself enters the climactic fray, taking the form of a giant peach marionette which the Peach Kid and his three young fellow fighters pilot Voltron-style. In fact, few moments in world cinema high or low can match the instant when that marionette opens its mouth and vomits forth a flying, sword-wielding Peach Kid, rocketing forward like a human missile to deliver the death blow to the villain. At that moment it seems like the only fitting response -- or, at least, the one most in the spirit of Child of Peach itself -- is to literally piss oneself laughing.

It's the 4DK Animalympics! Round 10



The terrifying, adorable dog from James Bond 777

Skill Set: Terrorism, adorable-ism, safe-cracking

The T.A.D. is the most formidable weapon in the arsenal of James Bond 777's criminal mastermind, "Boss": an animal so sweet natured in appearance that his victims will happily roll around on the floor and maul themselves to death just to please him. Add to this his ability to lead his canine cohorts in a daring bank robbery and you have before you a veritable poster child for misleadingly heartwarming anipal evil. Any Animalympics contestant spotlighted during a week in which 4DK has already prominently featured the frankly astonishing exploits of Teri Meherbaniyan's Moti is, of course, placed at a distinct disadvantage, but the T.A.D.... well, to be honest, probably won't be the one to topple Moti's lead. But, nonetheless: Awwwwwww.

Saturday, November 14, 2009

Teri Meherbaniyan (India, 1985)



I submit that no Bollywood movie is more of a love story between a man and his animal than Teri Meherbaniyan. For instance, notice that, while our hero is provided with a human love interest, she doesn't even survive until the interval. That's because no mere woman can compete for Ram's affections against his Moti, as played by Brownie, The Wonder Dog. At best, she'll only get in the way, hence Poonam Dhillon's summary dismissal via prophylactic suicide at roughly the one hour mark.

Teri Meherbaniyan begins with a motorcycle-riding Jackie Shroff running over a puppy. As harrowing as that may sound, this incident is actually meant to show us what a great guy Jackie's character is. Because, rather than charging bystanders a few rupees to watch the animal's death agonies or rushing it home to throw in the stew pot, he whisks it off to the vet for some puppy triage. The credits then roll as we watch a time-lapse montage of Jackie, aka Ram, tenderly nursing the pup back to health, ending with said pup having grown into a strapping, full-size Moti. And I have to admit, it's hard not to like the guy after witnessing this. Obviously Jackie's years of tending to that mustache have given him the small critter nurturing skills necessary to such ministrations.

Ram is a government officer of some kind, though exactly what his title might be is unclear. In any case, his job seems to entail him being some sort of agent of progress, sending him to backward, outlying villages with the message that feudalism is just so last century, and then driving that message home with his righteous fists. This message and mode of delivery is especially unwelcome in Lakhanpur, where Thakur Vijay Singh (Amrish Puri!) has got himself a nice little racket going exploiting and terrorizing the community of farmers under his charge. Thus Vijay Singh, who prefers to delegate his dirty work so that he may hide his viciousness behind a facade of benevolence, repeatedly dispatches his team of kung fu guys to deal with Ram, only to have those kung fu guys repeatedly sent packing by Ram's and Moti's superior martial arts skills.

Lakhanpur also boasts among its population a feisty, loudmouthed tomboy of a village belle by the name of Bijli (Poonam Dhillon), whose presence struck me as having the primary function of striking up pleasant audience associations with Hema Malini's similar role in Sholay. Be that as it may, it is not long before Ram and Bijli dutifully follow the script's directive to fall ass-over-teakettle in love with one another. No sooner have they proclaimed their affections, however, (during a song picturization in which Jackie Shroff wears an awesome tee-shirt labeling him a "SINGLE man") than Ram is called away for a brief assignment in the city. Given that Bijli is a target of Vijay Singh's unwanted and entirely unwholesome affections, Ram leaves Moti behind to guard over her in his absence.


The flaw in this plan becomes clear in a quite disturbing sequence that reveals Moti as being... well, a bit of a perv, really, and an interspecies one at that. Bijli responds to Ram's departure by immediately doing a really dirty wet sari dance and then stripping down to her, um, under-sari for a bath. Unfortunately, Moti won't stop peeking around the corner to get an eyeful, so Bijli ties him up in an adjoining room. This provides the perfect opportunity for Vijay Singh and his goons to burst in and try to make good on their rapacious designs, in a scene so liberally punctuated with lightning flashes and crashing thunder that I half expected Sultan Rahi to jump out from behind a curtain and start yelling and pointing at everybody. Bijli ultimately practices the preferred Bollywood method of rape prevention by plunging a dagger into her stomach and then using her dying breath to laugh in Vijay Singh's face as if she had somehow come out the winner in this situation.






Upon his return, Ram greets the news of Bijli's death by assuming that Moti has dropped the ball in his guard duties, leading him to beat the poor animal mercilessly. This is just one of many scenes that make Teri Meherbaniyan a film that, while appearing on paper as being geared toward animal lovers, would in reality be as distressing to them as watching actual vivisection. Ram is quickly alerted to the truth of the situation by Vijay Singh's kindly adopted-daughter/captive Sharada (I'm sorry, actress, I don't know your name), upon which he immediately falls to his knees and tearfully serenades Moti with the film's mournful theme tune. And it is at this moment that Brownie, The Wonder Dog, thespian, pulls out his secret weapon. He cries. HE FUCKING CRIES!


Though he has spent the first half of the movie proclaiming his love for Bijli, Vijay Singh quickly moves on after her death, simply transferring his rapey intentions to Sharada, despite the fact that she is his adopted daughter. Of course, we soon learn that he only adopted her in order to pilfer the fortune she inherited from her deceased father, a man whom Vijay Singh had claimed to be his best friend -- a fact which further establishes the depths of Vijay Singh's villainy while making his sexual proclivities no less vomit-conjuring. In any case, Ram somehow manages to deflect the Thakur's intentions by prodding Sharada into marrying the village's resident mute simpleton, Gopi. This turns out to be the move that finally tears it for Vijay Singh where Ram is concerned.

As we've already seen, tying up Moti does not bode well for those doing the tying, and so, when Ram, Sharada and Gopi do just that while enjoying a leisurely picnic in the countryside, we know that it is just a matter of seconds before Vijay Singh and his two right-hand men, Banwari and Sadarji, will emerge from the shadows to do their dirty work. With Gopi and Sharadi incapacitated, and Moti straining helplessly at his bonds, Vijay and his men viciously beat, choke and stab Ram to death, leaving behind manufactured evidence that will link Gopi to the crime. However, Ram had set up one of those newfangled camcorders in order to record his gang's bucolic interlude, and the device recorded the dastardly deed in its entirety. Of course, the machine was in Vijay Singh's plain view the whole time, but apparently, being essentially a bumpkin at heart, he assumed that it was just some kind of picnic-enabling robot that these city folks have nowadays. Thus he is blissfully unaware that he has just been Rodney King-ed several years before that name would have any significance as a verb.

So here we are with an hour remaining of Teri Meherbaniyan's running time and our apparent hero suddenly killed off. And it is at this point that something indescribably wonderful happens to Teri Meherbaniyan. By which I mean that our Moti steps up to take his rightful place in the spotlight in the most preposterously violent manner possible. Traumatized by seeing his master brutally murdered before his eyes, this most loyal of anipals sets out to single-pawedly hand out bloody payback to all those responsible. And with this, the remainder of the film takes on something of the look and tone of an 80s slasher film, complete with menacing stalker-vision sequences shot from Moti's point-of-view as he hunts down Vijay Singh's accomplices one by one, forcing one off a cliff and another into the river to drown, as he works his way up to the Thakur himself.









Each of these killings is immediately preceded by Moti experiencing a psychotic flashback to Ram's murder, communicated with quick cuts and repeated shock zooms to portray his fevered state of mind, and followed by a scene of him dropping flowers on Ram's grave and once again turning on the waterworks as the mournful theme reprises. Meanwhile, both Ram and Bijli manage to maintain a presence in the film by way of song and dance numbers that take place inside Moti's brain.

Nothing you might say could convince me that Teri Meherbaniyan is not the greatest Bollywood film about a revenge-obsessed, serial killing house pet ever made. I understand that the film -- along with, for obvious reasons, Brownie/Moti himself -- made something of a splash in its day, and I can see why. While its first half pretty much just trots out all of the standard Bollywood action movie tropes, it does so with the type of crude, reckless energy that I'm more accustomed to seeing in South Asia's regional pulp cinema -- complete, unfortunately, with much of the male-centric, Haseena Atom Bomb-like chauvinism that entails (for instance, the proximity of Bijli's wet sari dance to her attempted rape by Vijay Singh bears an uncomfortable suggestion of cause and effect). But it is its final act conversion into a sort of doggie Death Wish that makes Teri Meherbaniyan something all its own, something special. The very type of film, in fact, that is this humble blog's reason for being.
Ultimately, all of the humans in Teri Meherbaniyan prove to be pretty useless. Despite the presence of Ram's camcorder at the crime scene, it is only by the efforts of a solicitous snake from a neighboring shrine that the authorities are lead to the exonerating tape that it contained. And even then it is Moti who proves to be the ultimate instrument of justice, as demonstrated in a final confrontation in which Amrish Puri endures his fatal mauling with the same level of staunch professionalism he did having his head eaten by a giant crocodile at the end of Gangaa Jumanaa Saraswathi. If Teri Meherbaniyan has any message at all -- and it probably doesn't -- it is that the animals of the Earth are far from just acting as agents of an indifferent nature, and that, when they attack you, you better believe it's personal. See this movie.

Wednesday, November 11, 2009

Toys rule

I don't miss selling old toys. Once it got to the point where I had to be competitive, it became more about hassle and less about fun, which just seems kind of wrong. But, man, sometimes I sure do miss some of the cool crap I used to have:



Yes, the ugly truth is revealed. All those many Ultra series with their myriad variations on Ultraman and their armadas of futuristic vehicles were just about pimping toys to impressionable Japanese children. Ultraman was the He-Man of the 70s!

A Thunderbirds playset made in Spain during the mid 60s. I love the complete randomness of color selection in regards to the paintwork on the figures and vehicles, plus the fact that the box is made of wood with lithographed paper glued to it.

Now Mazinga can join you in the bathtub!

Crappy picture. Sorry. But, in case you can't make it out, that's a vinyl figure of one of the characters from that noted bit of MST3K fodder, Time of the Apes. Yes, that's right. Back in the day, someone actually made toys for Time of the effing Apes!

If I had a kid, I would totally make them wear these Kimba galoshes. Even if it wasn't raining.

Tuesday, November 10, 2009

Taiwanese-Style Kaiju - UPDATE!

Back in my earlier post on this topic, I mentioned that I was hoping to soon set my hands upon a copy of the 1971 Taiwanese fantasy film Tsu Hong Wu. Well, now I can tell you that I have set, not only my hands, but also my eyes upon Tsu Hong Wu and that, having done so, I can tell you that the information I previously conveyed to you about it was partially wrong. Of course, that also means that the information I conveyed about it was partially right, so let's have a great big, partial "hooray" for me. (As long as there's a "ray" sound in there somewhere so that I can continue in deluding myself that I mostly know what I'm talking about.)

Anyway, in that earlier post I stated that the 1982 Tawanese fantasy film The Fairy and The Devil borrowed all of its monster-intense special effects footage from Tsu Hong Wu. But now, having watched Tsu Hong Wu, I see that, while virtually all of its giant monster footage does indeed appear in The Fairy and The Devil, there is still a great deal of such footage in The Fairy and The Devil that does not appear in Tsu Hong Wu -- much of it, interestingly, featuring the same costumes and sets that were featured in those sequences in Tsu Hong Wu.

For instance, the white ape, red-haired giant and golden dragon from Tsu Hong Wu all make an appearance in Fairy, but the giant, rather than being defeated in battle by the dragon, as he is in Tsu Hong Wu, is instead defeated in Fairy by the white ape, who grows to giant size in order to fight him -- something that he isn't shown doing in the earlier film. In addition to that, Fairy also features some scenes involving monsters -- specifically a giant, kraken-like sea creature and an enormous floating demon head -- that make no appearance whatsoever in Tsu Hong Wu. And, by the way, is this not the geekiest post on this blog ever? Impressive.

Fortunately, it turns out that there has been some discussion about these films on the forums in the past weeks, with one poster in particular, Megatone over at the Cinehound.com forum, doing the hard work of identifying the possible sources of some of this footage. According to him, the aforementioned sea monster sequences in The Fairy and the Devil earlier appeared in the appropriately named Monster from the Sea, a Taiwanese film from (possibly) 1974 helmed by Yu Hon-Cheung, the clearly deranged director of the previously discussed The Dwarf Sorcerer. On top of that, he says, Fairy's sequence involving a fight between the golden dragon and an evil green dragon also appears in the earlier Sea God and Ghosts, a film which I, also apparently mistakenly, characterized as also borrowing all of its effects footage from Tsu Hong Wu.

Still unaccounted for, however, is the origin of the scene pitting the growed-up white ape against the red-haired giant, so there is still plenty of mystery to be wrung from The Fairy and the Devil's hodgepodge of stock monster footage. Also begging for coroboration is another Cinehound poster's translation of Tsu Hong Wu's credits, which apparently list Tsuburaya Productions' Koichi Takano, a special effects director who worked on a number of Tsuburaya's tokasatsu television series, as being responsible for the effects.

As for Tsu Hong Wu itself, the film focuses on the early years of the Hongwu emperor, the first ruler of the Ming Dynasty, covering the period from his birth through his time spent as a young boy at a Buddhist monastery. Of course, this telling of his story also includes lots of magic spells, homonculi, dragons and people being enveloped in cartoon auras, all of which would probably be disputed by some stuffy academic types -- but, hey, they weren't there, right?

As I was admittedly just watching the film for the giant monster battling action, almost all of which was crammed into its final minutes, I have to confess to having been a bit impatient with it, That said, had I been blessed with a copy with legible subtitles, and were I not consumed with such a pressing agenda, I think I would have found it quite entertaining. It's got fairly high production values for a Taiwanese film of its era and a pleasingly light tone. It's just too bad that the grim business of internet-based monster hunting doesn't afford me the time for such trifles. Onward!

It's the 4DK Animalympics! Round 9



Chimp in a fez from Jaani Dost

Skill Set: Come on, he's wearing a fez! Also, cross-dressing.

The chimp wearing a fez is an iconic figure in the world of screen animals. It is for this reason that, despite the fact that I only have a pale ghost of a memory of even watching Jaani Dost, I am including Bollywood's tribute to him therein in the Animalympics. What I do remember about the chimp wearing a fez from Jaani Dost is that he was evil, and that the chimp who played him executed a double turn worthy of Peter Sellers by also portraying the female chimp wearing a sari who was the love interest of the chimp wearing a fez. This of course opened up the potential for all kinds of disturbingly literal representations of simian self love, but at least it provided a momentary distraction from the spectacle of Dharmendra and Jeetendra running around in superhero suits while each proclaiming himself The Lion King. I may be wrong, but I'm pretty sure that the chimp wearing a fez wasn't even given a name in Jaani Dost. In any case, I'm not going to watch it again to make sure. That movie was terrible.

Saturday, November 7, 2009

Just for the awesomeness



Behold the Spotnicks, a Swedish instrumental group who, during their early 60s heyday, performed dressed in awesome looking spacesuits. I've found that not only do I enjoy these clips for the visual joy they provide, but also that I really dig the group's music, which sounds like it emanates from some spectral meeting point between Les Paul and Joe Meek.

I also think that this hypnotic clip for their "Spotnicks Theme" is sheer brilliance:



And guess what? They're still together! No sign of the spacesuits though.

Wednesday, November 4, 2009

The Brain Stealers (Hong Kong, 1968)


The Brain Stealers’ villain, one Dr. Zero, wants to get his hands on a certain growth-accelerating serum so that he can create an army of supermen and conquer the world. It's a fairly run-of-the-mill scheme for a villain in a 1960s spy movie, until you consider the comparatively mundane smuggling and counterfeiting operations that the Shaw Brothers typically had the evil masterminds in their espionage films of the period undertake. In that light, it comes across as a rare example of one of their super villains for once coming equipped with proportionate ambitions. Hard to say why this was, exactly. After all, the Shaws' kung fu films had no shortage of scoundrels with their sights set on ruling the fabled Martial World. But when it came to our own, not-nearly-so-martial world, it seems the biggest picture your average Mr. Big could wrap his head around was the transport of some phony dollars to the Philippines hidden in the trunks of old cars.

Anyway, the man responsible for the sought-after growth-accelerating serum is Hong Kong scientist Dr. Li Zong-Hua (Goo Man-Chung). The authorities at UN Intelligence already suspect that Li has been targeted by Dr. Zero, given that the villain has abducted several other scientists of compatible disciplines from around the globe, and so recruit Li's daughter Chiu-Lan to be their agent within the Li camp. The stated reason for this is that, in a very brief demonstration, Chiu-Lan has proven herself to be pretty good at Judo, though I also suspect that the fact that she has the sultry looks and ability to model mod fashions to pleasing effect that any heroine in a fluffy spy caper of this type should have has something to do with it. And to slam the point home, Chiu-Lan is played by Lily Ho, who had already proven herself adept at exactly this type of role in the Shaws' earlier Angel With the Iron Fists and The Angel Strikes Back.





The means by which Dr. Zero hopes to hijack Li and his formula involves a "nuclear device" of his own invention that enables him to suck the brain from one person and put it into the body of another. To this end, he kidnaps Li's son Yuan Ming (Chin Feng) and shuffles his brain with that of one of his criminal minions, a fellow by the name of Peter, after which said minion is sent off to infiltrate the virtuous Dr. Li's family circle. Unfortunately, even with the benefit of his subject's actual body to work with, Peter proves to be terrible at the whole evil double business. In addition to failing to recognize Yau-Ming's colleagues, he is scowly while Yau-Ming is typically cheerful, left-handed while Yau-Ming favors his right, and whiskey-swilling while Yau-Ming is a teetotaler. As a result, the members of the Li household not all that surprisingly suspect him of being a bit hinky from the outset. It is perhaps, then, out of a feeling of having nothing to lose that Peter eventually blows his cover completely by trying to force himself upon Chiu-Lan (and no, I can’t believe they went there either).

Meanwhile, the executives of a Japanese chemical company hire former Interpol agent Chang Tse-Xia (Lin Chi-Yung) to steal Li's formula for their own commercial purposes. Hence it is not long before Tse-Xia crosses paths with Chiu-Lan and the romantic sparks begin to fly. His shadowy agenda notwithstanding (The Brain Stealers’ clear position is that corporate espionage exists on a far more forgivable plane than the political kind), one ends up hoping that the rakish Tse-Xia is successful in winning Chiu-Lan’s heart, because Chiu-Lan’s fiancé is played by the strictly vanilla actor Peter Chen Ho, who song-and-danced alongside Lily Ho in Brain Stealers director Inoue Umetsugu’s earlier Hong Kong Nocturne, and is hence something of a sop. Unfortunately, the sexual politics of Hong Kong films of this era are such that such an upset is unlikely to occur. Unless, of course, there was to be some kind of surprising last minute twist…






Umetsugu Inoue was the most prolific, as well as one of the most successful, of the number of Japanese directors that Shaw Brothers recruited during the 60s. Before coming to Hong Kong he had worked for what was, given the tendency of Japanese film professionals of the era to be staunch company men, a surprising array of Japanese studios -- including Nikkatsu, Daei, Toei and Shochiku –- and had worked in various genres, including swordplay and gangster films. He was also responsible for bringing the first adaptation of Edogawa Rampo’s Black Lizard to the screen in 1963, five years before Kinji Fukasaku’s more well known version. Once ensconced at Shaw, he became known for frothy and vibrantly colorful musicals like the aforementioned Hong Kong Nocturne and feather-light romantic comedies seemingly molded to the template of the Rock Hudson and Doris Day films. Though he did helm one other spy caper for the Shaws, 1967’s Operation Lipstick, such films were definitely a departure for him genre-wise in terms of his work for the studio. That is not to say, however, that The Brain Stealers doesn’t bare his distinctive imprint.

Sadly, The Brain Stealers is among those films in the Shaw catalog that Celestial never got around to releasing on DVD, so I was forced to make due with a glitchy gray market DVD made from an obviously well-worn VHS source. As a result, what I saw was less the movie itself than a pale and jittery ghost of it. Even so, it was hard to miss Inoue’s penchant for flamboyant art design and costuming, especially as exhibited in Dr. Zero’s fabulously cartoonish subterranean lair and Lily Ho’s Carnaby Street inflected wardrobe. (Dr. Zero himself is no slouch in terms of OTT representation, either, coming accessorized as he does with a black cape, eye patch and disfiguring facial scars – basically the whole super-villain package.) In addition, the giddy convolutions of the movie’s plot have an antic and farcical quality to them that, if played less straight, would not be out of place in one of the director’s comedies of the period. So basically Inoue here brings his own style to the SB brand of Bond-alike nonsense -- usually handled in a much more utilitarian manner by Lo Wei -- and definitely stakes a claim for it as his own.





In fact, for the first half of The Brain Stealers, it almost seems like Inoue has gotten so involved in reeling out the film’s multiple characters and intrigues that he has forgotten to deliver those fizzy action set pieces that such a film typically leads us to expect. The one exception is a fight that takes place in Dr. Li’s animal testing lab, during which a ravenous hawk that Peter/Yuan Ming has set free as a distraction buzzes the participants perilously as they deal and dodge each other’s blows. This all changes once the film’s action moves to Tokyo and things really kick into gear, going in quick succession from a dramatic fight atop the Tokyo Tower to an assassination attempt by a sultry female snake charmer -- all leading, of course, to a climactic conflagration in Dr. Zero’s den of evil with all it’s acid pits, spike-walled rooms, and giant eyeball adorned holding chambers.

The Brain Stealers’ combination of 50s sci-fi, para-Bondian spy-jinks and general 1960s silliness makes for a very fun watch. Or I should say it would, were it available to us in a format that was actually watchable. Getting through the murky and stuttering disc that I was stuck with, complete with its barely legible subtitles that were cut off on either side, was something of a chore. But it’s a testament to the film that I was motivated to soldier through it despite that, and was even able to eke out a fair amount of enjoyment from it. In fact, my only real complaint about the film itself is that Lily Ho’s character is less emancipated than one might hope, and essentially teeters uneasily between being a kickass heroine in the Emma Peel mode and filling the stock role of the scientist’s imperiled daughter that you always find in these movies. Of course, her similar treatment in the Angel movies shouldn’t lead anyone to expect much different, and we should probably just be thankful that this time there’s at least some compensation in there being a bit more of a feminine sensibility overall.

So, in closing, I’m going to resort to something that I know has become a bit of a nagging refrain on this blog, by which I mean my once again ending a positive review of a film by pleading that someone please, please, please release it on a proper DVD. Even as a jittering ghost, The Brain Stealers entertains, but on a lovingly prepared disc, presented in all its comic-book-colorful glory, it would completely rock.

It's the 4DK Animalympics! Round 8


Puppy from Hunterwali

Skill Set: Loyalty, equestrianism

I am clearly an awful man. Hunterwali is rife with rape, talk of honor killing, and brutal violence. But at the end of it, a dog rides a horse. What do I take away from it? That's right, it's the movie where a dog rides a horse. Don't hold it against Puppy, though. He can ride a horse.

Monday, November 2, 2009

From the Lucha Diaries Vaults: El Aguila Real (Mexico, 1971)

It’s time for From the Lucha Diaries Vaults again, which can only mean one thing. That little thing called “life” has once again stepped in and prevented me from watching any obscure old foreign pulp movies to review for you, thus forcing me to recycle old content from The Lucha Diaries to keep things rolling over.

For those of you who are new to this ritual, The Lucha Diaries is a site that I created a couple years ago in connection with my project to watch and write capsule reviews of as many classic Mexican Wrestling movies as I could get my hands on. Said project continued until I developed a rare, highly selective form of hysterical blindness that resulted in me only being able to see a static image of a crudely drawn vase of flowers whenever I looked at any movie containing Superzan.

So basically From the Lucha Diaries Vaults is a lot like one of those clip-based flashback episodes that your favorite sitcom used to air as mid-season filler. So much so, in fact, that we might as well frame it in the same way. So here goes.


RICHIE
Hey, guys! Remember when Todd watched El Aguila Real… and then WROTE about it?

POTSY
What a nerd!

JOANIE
I love Chachi!

THE FONZ
Aaaaaaaay!

Suddenly things start to go all wobbly as we FADE TO:

******

So I woke up last night with this horrible idea that some Spanish speaking person might happen across this site and try to run it through Babel Fish or Google Translator or something, and that the resulting garbled interpretation would somehow make me look like more of an asshole than I am -- or, at least, a different kind of asshole than the kind I'm trying to portray myself as. I mean, those things might work okay with a site that's actually trying to dispense clear, practical information about its chosen subject, but when a site's subject is just a springboard for its author to engage in self involved ramblings and transparent attempts at cleverness, it's a different story. To reassure myself, I ran my review of Triunfo de los Campeones Justicieros through Babel Fish, translating it first into Spanish and then back into English, and got this result:
“I do not know the jails work. I am not elegant that way. But I think that they can work in the same way that the films of Justicieros Champions work. The fact that these films offer to equipment of the greatest stars of the masked fight, and it aspires, the marks he touching to say that they are less than the sum of his pieces...”
While it's true that I don't know the jails work -- and that may or may not be a testament to my inelegance -- this did not exactly put my mind to rest. There must be a solution to this problem, though none presents itself at the moment. Whatever I do, however, it's clear that I'll eventually have to get around to talking about El Aguila Real, as much as I want to avoid doing so.

My viewing of El Aguila Real represents another dip into the stinky troth that is Netflix's selection of Santo films. It's also a product of my recent efforts to plow through some of these lesser Santo movies and avoid the inevitable result of cherry picking my way through the catalog (i.e. that I would be left staring out across a dispiriting wasteland of lucha movie detritus with no remaining high points to break up the monotony). So far this campaign has put me in contact with the listless Santo en la Frontera del Terror, the alluringly horrible Santo Frente a la Muerte and the surprisingly not so sucky Santo contra los Secuestradores.

While those movies all had their small share of saving graces to put alongside their many sins, it never occurred to me in the case of any of them to think, "Well, at least it didn't have any animal cruelty in it!" El Aguila Real, on the other hand, can be summarized as follows: Boring bit, boring bit, footage of a real horse tumbling down a cliff, tedium, footage of a real cockfight, snore, snore, Santo forcing a house cat to drink poison, zzzzzzzzzz, footage of a real rabbit being shot, drool, snort, an eagle being forced into a burlap bag and slammed against a wall, boring, boring, the end. In other words, like a crazy alcoholic parent, El Aguila Real keeps waking you from a sound sleep for the sole purpose of traumatizing you.

Now, as far as animal snuff goes, I know that arguments can be made about artistic justifications for such material in some cases, but we're not talking about The Rules of the Game here. And if you are so obstinate as to doubt that fact, that you need proof that revered French auteur Jean Renoir did not in fact direct the Santo film El Aguila Real under a pseudonym, just ask yourself whether Renoir would have relied quite so heavily on the abysmal comic relief antics of Santo's manager Carlos Suarez as the director here does.

With it's singular combination of boredom and pointless slaughter, El Aguila Real stakes out a new frontier of Santo movie badness, one that actually serves to elevate other bad lucha movies. As a result, I am now forced to reevaluate Santo contra los Cazodores de Cabezas with a more forgiving eye, and may even issue a formal apology to Superzan. So thanks for that, El Aguila Real. In terms of plot, in can be said that the film offers a change of pace from other Santo films, in that it's basically a rural melodrama, but that's not enough to recommend it. Nor is the fact that it showcases the singing of star Irma Serrano, though the scenes of her pitching woo with our masked hero are admittedly pretty hysterical.

To sum up, in the interest of better international communication, I will render my final verdict in Babel Fish: “The true Aguila is a bad film. Stay far from her!”